Kate DiCamillo Appreciation: The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane

No, this isn't a book review. Far from it. It's a long, gushing post about how awesome Kate DiCamillo is.

First things first: this is a collaborative post between Topaz, AnQi, Christina, Taylor, and myself. Essentially, AnQi tweeted about the word "chiaroscuro", which prompted The Tale of Despereaux feels, which prompted general Kate DiCamillo feels, which prompted this five-way fangirl post.

Yes, I put in two graphics. Because both Christina and Topaz made graphics and I suck at decisions.

For those of you who haven't read it (HOW DARE YOU), The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane is the story of how a china doll rabbit who doesn't understand love is parted from his owners repeatedly until he does understand love and reunites with the daughter of his now-adult first owner. I first read it because my mum bought it. No sweet story here, sorry.

Here's why you should read it if you haven't, or fangirl if you have:


"Once, in a house on Egypt Street, there lived a rabbit who was made almost entirely of china. He had china arms and china legs, china paws and a china head, a china torso and a china nose. His arms and legs were jointed and joined by wire so that his china elbows and china knees could be bent, giving him much freedom of movement.
His ears were made of real rabbit fur, and beneath the fur, there were strong, bendable wires, which allowed the ears to be arranged into poses that reflected the rabbit’s mood — jaunty, tired, full of ennui. His tail, too, was made of real rabbit fur and was fluffy and soft and well shaped.
The rabbit’s name was Edward Tulane, and he was tall. He measured almost three feet from the tip of his ears to the tip of his feet; his eyes were painted a penetrating and intelligent blue.
... The china rabbit was in possession of an extraordinary wardrobe composed of handmade silk suits, custom shoes fashioned from the finest leather and designed specifically for his rabbit feet, and a wide array of hats equipped with holes so that they could easily fit over Edward’s large and expressive ears. Each pair of well-cut pants had a small pocket for Edward’s gold pocket watch."
I know this is a really long quote, but damn. These are the first few pages of the book, and goodness, younger me SO wanted a china rabbit for myself. Scratch that, re-reading this excerpt still makes me want one, even knowing this isn't entirely the point of the story.

And what's better: Edward Tulane snarks. He is condescending and snarky and he will make you laugh so much until his world falls apart and he breaks and so will your heart. And then the ending will mend you all over again. THE FEELS.


It's not a retelling per se, but like The Tale of Despereaux, the book draws heavily from the traditional fairytale. In the story, we have the story of a princess. Who is turned into a warthog. And not kissed by the prince. And just killed. No happy ending. Can you imagine how much that terrified my younger self and how much it impresses my present self?

AND. AND. DiCamillo manages to subvert her OWN fairytale in this, because Edward Tulane sort of gets a bittersweet-ish happy-ish ending (children's book, guys) that made me melt into a puddle and die. Aaaaah.

3. And the adults.

You know how in some children's books the adults are either full-blown evil or clueless? Well, NOT HERE.

The illustration under fairytale is Pellegrina, Edward's owner's grandmother, and she's the one who tells the in-story fairytale. She's like a little creepy and seems to know what Edward is thinking and feels like the typical prophesying hag, but she's so delightfully creepy. And at the same time not really malicious. Aaah.

Then we have Nella and Lawrence, a fisherman and his wife, the first picture under this section. Also Bull, a tramp. All of these are adults who care for Edward, and they're so nice and understanding and eeek. Yes, this post will involve a great deal of these useless sounds.

And last of all, we have a doll-mender (spoiler) called Lucius Clark. Now, I know his name sounds evil, but he's not. He genuinely has a passion for dolls and such, I think, not to mention immense skill. He isn't the Good Samaritan type, but he's not evil or immoral or even amoral. He's pretty fair. Also, he indirectly helped Edward to his semi-happy ending on two counts so he has a bit of leeway. But, y'know, he's STILL AWESOME.

Yay, I forewent exclamations for caps.

4. Illustration goodness.

I ... really dunno what to write here. The illustrations are to die for, and you've seen them above, and I don't want to make this an overly long post, so I'll just wrap up with one more:

And don't forget to check out all the other DiCamillo books of our childhood:

Topaz Winters: The Tale of Despereaux
AnQi Yu: Tiger Rising
Christina Im: Because of Winn-Dixie
Taylor Lynn: Flora and Ulysses

What's your favourite DiCamillo book? Have you got any other children's books that have stayed with you even after childhood? Let us know in the comments!

By the way, the five of us are considering turning this Literary Appreciation Series into a link-up, but it really depends if you guys are interested; so do let us know via comment or any other way if you would like to participate!

Note: All photos have been linked back to the source; if they're incorrectly sourced or you'd like me to remove them, please contact me here.


  1. Wow, that's super cool! I can remember being read this when I was back in 5th or 6th grade...But I feel like I appreciate the pictures a lot more now, even though the story is a little bit fuzzy. Still, I remember loving Because of Winn-Dixie best of all the books. Fourth grade me LOVED it. :D

    This is a really cool idea—I'm gonna go look at all the others. :D

    1. Actually, I had to re-read this to refresh my memory on the details too, but that burning urge for a china rabbit due to the pictures is ETERNAL. And you should definitely check out Christina's post on Winn-Dixie -- it's an amazing post!

  2. Ah, Edward Tulane. It's such a marvelous story, isn't it? Like Heather, it's been awhile since I read it so the details are a little bit fuzzy, but I still remember that it's an absolutely fantastic story. I mean, how could it not be, with Kate DiCamillo writing it? And I know just what you mean about adults in kids' books; the funny thing is, it's like a lot of people assume no one wants to read about adults in a kid's book, but when they're drawn as well as these characters were, how can you NOT like them?

    Fabulous post, Alyssa--I love it!

    1. Kate DiCamillo is queen. (Like, at least until our next woman #litlove author.) Exactly on point about the adults -- I've seen this post floating around on Tumblr on how Disney portrays parents and adults in general as not being always right, and while that's an important message too, we have to remember they too can be as heartwarming as the kids. (And the china rabbits.)

      Thanks so much, Taylor; loved your post too (and I swear I'm going to comment on it. I read it and the tab is open waiting for me to type up my comment, but argh. Still catching up on life.)

  3. The fact that I'm so desperately, ridiculously in love with an inanimate object is... possibly an issue, I think. ;) Edward Tulane pulls alllll the heartstrings, and the illustrations are beyond gorgeous, which only makes the text even more emotional. I haven't read it in SO LONG, though, and that needs to be remedied. (To be honest, I think I'm just going to go reread all of Kate DiCamillo's books after seeing our Lit Love posts. You guys have reminded me why I fell in love with her in the first place!)

    1. *stares at bookshelf* I think I have lots of issues. My issues have issues. My issues also have china rabbits, because Edward Tulane eeeeeeeek. I know, same here; I especially feel the need to reread Despereaux because it was my grade text and I sort of became disillusioned with it around exam time. But like you said, your post really reminded me why I had ALL THE FEELS when I first read it.

  4. Okay, I can't even with Edward Tulane. This list - and the illustration/quote-y goodness that you included with it - just brought all my china rabbit feels back to the surface. And you pointed out some observations about the book that I didn't quite get before, so this post was enlightening as well as feels-making. GAH. This post was awesome.

    1. CHINA RABBIT FEELS. They are a legit thing. Secret confession: I actually have a stash of rabbit dolls from after I read the book. Not china, unfortunately, but they were definitely not randomly purchased. Thanks so much for reading!

  5. Oh, I remember this one! And Despereaux! I really need to read her other books, too.
    I'm getting the intense urge right now to pick those wonderfully-illustrated books off my shelf and read them all over again.

    1. Yes! Yes you should! All of DiCamillo's books are awesome :D The illustrations are gorgeous, aren't they? They have that bedtime story feel while subverting so many fairytale conventions.

      Thanks so much for dropping by! Hope you enjoyed this dose of #litlove :D


IMPORTANT: Please use Name/URL instead of Wordpress/OpenID to comment, otherwise Blogger hobbits will eat your words. So sorry about this. Thanks!

I respond to all comments and would love to check out your blog if you leave a link :D Unless it's spam. Then I'll delete the comment and put you on the takeout blacklist, what a shame!